Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

Bug 797282

Summary: sssd-1.5.1-66.el6.x86_64 needs openldap >=openldap-2.4.23-20.el6.x86_64
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 Reporter: Nicolas Corrarello <ncorrare>
Component: sssdAssignee: Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: IDM QE LIST <seceng-idm-qe-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2CC: dgregor, grajaiya, jgalipea, kbanerje, prc
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: sssd-1.8.0-10.el6 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No technical note required
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 11:55:08 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Nicolas Corrarello 2012-02-24 18:48:16 UTC
Description of problem:
Doing a yum -y install ipa-client on a RHEL 6.1 does not update openldap. When running ipa-client-install sssd segfaults with: kernel: sssd_be[10632]: segfault at 10 ip 00007f294c911eee sp 00007fffdd8fe3b0 error 4 in                  libldap-2.4.so.2.5.2[7f294c8fe000+43000]

This was tested with openldap-2.4.19-15.el6.x86_64 . It works with the latest openldap.

Comment 1 Stephen Gallagher 2012-02-24 18:51:35 UTC
Apparently at some point we made some assumptions in SSSD that require openldap to be using Mozilla-NSS for crypto, so we broke compatibility with openldap 2.4.19 (as shipped in 6.0).

We should add a versioned dependency on the latest openldap.

Comment 7 Stephen Gallagher 2012-04-10 16:51:44 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No technical note required

Comment 8 Kaushik Banerjee 2012-04-26 07:42:35 UTC
Verification steps:
1. During sssd upgrade, without openldap >= 2.4.23-20, I get the following error:

Error: Package: sssd-1.8.0-24.el6.x86_64 (sssd63)
           Requires: openldap >= 2.4.23-20
           Installed: openldap-2.4.19-15.el6.x86_64 

2. With openldap >= 2.4.23-20, the error no longer appears.


Verified with version sssd-1.8.0-24.el6.x86_64

Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 11:55:08 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0747.html