Bug 797814 - netatalk : Conflicts with jday
Summary: netatalk : Conflicts with jday
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: netatalk
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Andrew Bauer
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-02-27 10:53 UTC by Michael Schwendt
Modified: 2019-10-31 00:57 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: netatalk-3.1.12-11.fc31
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-10-31 00:57:59 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michael Schwendt 2012-02-27 10:53:12 UTC
=> netatalk-2.2.2-1.fc17.src.rpm
=> 4:netatalk-2.2.2-1.fc17.i686 in fedora-development-i386
  File conflict with: jday-2.4-7.fc17.i686
     /usr/bin/dbd

[semi-automated bug report]

Comment 1 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2012-04-12 12:32:42 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 2 Fedora End Of Life 2013-04-03 18:45:51 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 19 development cycle.
Changing version to '19'.

(As we did not run this process for some time, it could affect also pre-Fedora 19 development
cycle bugs. We are very sorry. It will help us with cleanup during Fedora 19 End Of Life. Thank you.)

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora19

Comment 4 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2014-07-02 08:47:17 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 5 Christopher Meng 2015-03-02 14:38:02 UTC
Adding jday owner here.

Can jday be retired? It has a dead upstream for years.

Comment 6 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2016-02-26 17:53:43 UTC
This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database.  Reassigning to the new owner of this component.

Comment 7 Andrew Bauer 2019-10-22 13:57:42 UTC
I am going to close out this bug, originally reported in 2012. While I agree the conflict with /usr/bin/dbd is an issue, I can see no simple fix  for this that can be made on the netatalk side. If anyone disagrees, feel free to reopen this with a patch or detailed solution to the problem.

Comment 8 Michael Schwendt 2019-10-22 15:45:10 UTC
The following the guidelines:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Conflicts/

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2019-10-22 17:16:10 UTC
FEDORA-2019-42fe4293b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-42fe4293b5

Comment 10 Michael Schwendt 2019-10-22 20:22:26 UTC
Is that with or without contacting the FPC?
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Conflicts/#_other_uses_of_conflicts

Comment 11 Fedora Update System 2019-10-23 15:44:32 UTC
netatalk-3.1.12-11.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-42fe4293b5

Comment 12 Fedora Update System 2019-10-31 00:57:59 UTC
netatalk-3.1.12-11.fc31 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.