RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 798361 - Missing anonymous limits in IPA
Summary: Missing anonymous limits in IPA
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ipa
Version: 6.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Rob Crittenden
QA Contact: IDM QE LIST
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-02-28 18:04 UTC by Rob Crittenden
Modified: 2012-06-20 13:20 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ipa-2.2.0-4.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
No documentation needed.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 13:20:01 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0819 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE ipa bug fix and enhancement update 2012-06-19 20:34:17 UTC

Description Rob Crittenden 2012-02-28 18:04:30 UTC
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2452

We are not setting LDAP anonymous access limits correctly. This is an excerpt of ipaupgrade.log:

{{{
2012-02-27T15:59:56Z DEBUG add: 'dc=com' to nsslapd-anonlimitsdn, current value ['dc=com', u'cn=anonymous-limits', u'cn=etc', u'dc=idm', u'dc=lab', u'dc=bos', u'dc=redhat']
2012-02-27T15:59:56Z DEBUG add: updated value [u'cn=anonymous-limits', u'cn=etc', u'dc=idm', u'dc=lab', u'dc=bos', u'dc=redhat', u'dc=com']
}}}

`cn=anonymous-limits,cn=etc,SUFFIX` also does not contain the limits. Anonymous connections thus are not as restricted as they ought to be.

Comment 1 Rob Crittenden 2012-02-28 18:07:02 UTC
We increase the server global limits to:

dn: cn=config,cn=ldbm database,cn=plugins,cn=config
nsslapd-lookthroughlimit:100000
nsslapd-idlistscanlimit:100000

The attempt to limit anonymous searches was incorrect but it should look like:

dn: cn=anonymous-limits,cn=etc,$SUFFIX
objectclass:nsContainer
objectclass:top
cn: anonymous-limits
nsSizeLimit: 5000

And in cn=config a pointer to this limit:

nsslapd-anonlimitsdn:cn=anonymous-limits,cn=etc,$SUFFIX

Comment 4 Jenny Severance 2012-03-21 19:42:37 UTC
verified :

# ldapsearch -x -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w Secret123 -b "cn=config" | grep nsslapd-lookthroughlimit
nsslapd-lookthroughlimit: 100000

# ldapsearch -x -D "cn=Directory Manager" -w Secret123 -b "cn=config" | grep nsslapd-idlistscanlimit
nsslapd-requiresrestart: cn=config,cn=ldbm:nsslapd-idlistscanlimit
nsslapd-idlistscanlimit: 100000

version :
ipa-server-2.2.0-4.el6.x86_64

Comment 6 Martin Kosek 2012-04-24 13:31:04 UTC
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
No documentation needed.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 13:20:01 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0819.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.