Hide Forgot
Description of problem: help message of subscription-manager service-levels is displaying wrong command name Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): [root@dhcp201-166 pki]# rpm -qa | grep subscription-manager subscription-manager-gnome-0.99.8-1.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-0.99.8-1.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-migration-0.99.8-1.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-migration-data-1.12-1.el6.noarch subscription-manager-debuginfo-0.99.8-1.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: [root@dhcp201-166 pki]# subscription-manager service-levels --help Usage: subscription-manager service-level [OPTIONS] ^^^ should be "service-levels" Display the service levels available for an organization. If I try with command service-level,I get the following message [root@dhcp201-166 pki]# subscription-manager service-level --list Usage: subscription-manager [options] MODULENAME --help Primary Modules: list List subscription and product information for this machine Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
Please undo commit in comment #2 dgoodwin and I settled on "subscription-manager service-level" without the "s" because the default option behavior for subscription-manager service-level is to "--show" which displays the consumer's current service level. Hence the singular form of "subscription-manager service-level" makes the most sense and returns the same value as "subscription-manager service-level --show".
Moving to verified.. RPM used: [root@dhcp201-162 ~]# rpm -qa | grep subscription-manager subscription-manager-0.99.8-1.git.16.f7ed3d6.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-migration-0.99.8-1.git.16.f7ed3d6.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-firstboot-0.99.8-1.git.16.f7ed3d6.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-migration-data-1.12.1-1.git.4.7b6cf92.el6.noarch subscription-manager-gnome-0.99.8-1.git.16.f7ed3d6.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-debuginfo-0.99.8-1.el6.x86_64 [root@dhcp201-162 ~]# subscription-manager service-level --help Usage: subscription-manager service-level [OPTIONS] Manage service levels for this system.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0804.html