Hide Forgot
Created attachment 567880 [details] UI Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.Login to conductor 2.move to clouds 3.click on "edit" button displayed against the "Default" cloud resource zone Actual results: Observed that the edit page has two "Cancel" buttons with same functionality(PFA: UI.png) Expected results: The page should have only one cancel button, and on clicking the button it should go to the appropriate page( or the previous page from which the user clicked edit) Additional info: [root@ibm-ls22-03 ~]# rpm -qa | grep aeolus aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.0-39.el6.noarch aeolus-configure-2.5.0-16.el6.noarch rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.3.0-12.el6.noarch aeolus-all-0.8.0-39.el6.noarch rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-11.el6.noarch aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-39.el6.noarch aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.0-39.el6.noarch
Observation #2 Edit "Catalog" page is having two buttons "Cancel Editing" and "Cancel" button doing the same functionality. On click of these button, the user is taken to "Catalog" page. Expected result: The page is expected to have only one "cancel" button that takes the user to "Catalog" page
Created attachment 567894 [details] Observation 2
fix posted in https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/aeolus-devel/2012-March/009499.html
fixed in commit 285f0e0a47e519cf1241b4a6b0ee791c33ca9d73
Observed that now only one cancel button is displayed in the pages mentioned above. Verified in rpm -qa | grep aeolus aeolus-configure-2.5.0-18.el6.noarch rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-12.el6.noarch rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.3.0-14.el6.noarch aeolus-conductor-0.8.0-43.el6.noarch aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.0-43.el6.noarch aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.0-43.el6.noarch aeolus-all-0.8.0-43.el6.noarch
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0583.html