Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 803519
alternative to shared file system in JCR
Last modified: 2013-11-04 19:51:00 EST
It seems that we could have an alternative to shared file system in JCR based on the exo-jcr document:
Have we fully tested? If no, can we test this feature?
We also need to document it in our reference guide and/or migration guide.
This request comes from GE - https://na7.salesforce.com/500A0000009ewlw
This is only for Lucene indexes and need to be QAed properly
Unassigning from Mark, as he's no longer looking after EPP.
Default in JPP 6.0 is local storage of lucene indexes. Shared file system is no longer a must have requirement (Can still be preferred in certain scenarios)