Hide Forgot
Description of problem: The help wording used for the --servicelevel option should be consistent among the modules. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): # rpm -q subscription-manager subscription-manager-0.99.10-1.git.81.a50d05a.el6.x86_64 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: # subscription-manager register --help | grep SERVICE --servicelevel=SERVICE_LEVEL # subscription-manager subscribe --help | grep SERVICE --servicelevel=SERVICE_LEVEL # subscription-manager list --help | grep SERVICE --servicelevel=SERVICELEVEL ^ EXPECTED AN UNDERSCORE CHARACTER FOR CONSISTENCY Actual results: --servicelevel=SERVICELEVEL Expected results: --servicelevel=SERVICE_LEVEL
73143dda7fc121fb16c6f8ab933b1bf72349c896 Available in subscription-manager-0.99.12+
verified. RPM version: [root@skallesh ~]# rpm -qa | grep subscription-manager subscription-manager-firstboot-0.99.11-1.git.1.73143dd.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-gnome-0.99.11-1.git.1.73143dd.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-0.99.11-1.git.1.73143dd.el6.x86_64 subscription-manager-migration-data-1.12.1.1-1.git.6.ea6813e.el6.noarch subscription-manager-migration-0.99.11-1.git.1.73143dd.el6.x86_64 [root@skallesh ~]# subscription-manager list --help | grep SERVICE --servicelevel=SERVICE_LEVEL [root@skallesh ~]# subscription-manager register --help | grep SERVICE --servicelevel=SERVICE_LEVEL [root@skallesh ~]# subscription-manager subscribe --help | grep SERVICE --servicelevel=SERVICE_LEVEL
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0804.html