Description of problem: I'm trying to install ceph.i686 on a x86-64 arch system with already installed ceph.x86-64, since I'm trying to build qemu for i686. Installing using yum install gives an error on conflicting files Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install ceph-0.43-1.fc17.x86_64 2. Install ceph-0.43-1.fc17.i686 Actual results: Step #2 fails with output in Additional Info Expected results: Both installs side by side. Additional info: I guess it should be split to a ceph-common.noarch ? (the python and /etc bits) yum output: yum install -y ceph.i686 [snipped part of the output up to the error] Transaction Check Error: file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ceph from install of ceph-0.43-1.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.43-1.fc17.x86_64 file /sbin/mkcephfs from install of ceph-0.43-1.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.43-1.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/bin/ceph-debugpack from install of ceph-0.43-1.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.43-1.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rados.pyc from install of ceph-0.43-1.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.43-1.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rados.pyo from install of ceph-0.43-1.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.43-1.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbd.pyc from install of ceph-0.43-1.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.43-1.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbd.pyo from install of ceph-0.43-1.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.43-1.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rgw.pyc from install of ceph-0.43-1.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.43-1.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rgw.pyo from install of ceph-0.43-1.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.43-1.fc17.x86_64
Bug is still present in latest package: # yum -y install ceph Loaded plugins: changelog, downloadonly, priorities, remove-with-leaves, show- : leaves, tsflags 16 packages excluded due to repository priority protections Package ceph-0.44-5.fc17.x86_64 already installed and latest version Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package ceph.i686 0:0.44-5.fc17 will be installed --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: ceph i686 0.44-5.fc17 fedora 10 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 1 Package Total size: 10 M Installed size: 36 M Downloading Packages: Running Transaction Check Running Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /etc/rc.d/init.d/ceph from install of ceph-0.44-5.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.44-5.fc17.x86_64 file /sbin/mkcephfs from install of ceph-0.44-5.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.44-5.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/bin/ceph-debugpack from install of ceph-0.44-5.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.44-5.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rados.pyc from install of ceph-0.44-5.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.44-5.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rados.pyo from install of ceph-0.44-5.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.44-5.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbd.pyc from install of ceph-0.44-5.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.44-5.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rbd.pyo from install of ceph-0.44-5.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.44-5.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rgw.pyc from install of ceph-0.44-5.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.44-5.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rgw.pyo from install of ceph-0.44-5.fc17.i686 conflicts with file from package ceph-0.44-5.fc17.x86_64 Error Summary -------------
I am a little confused as to why one would wish to install both x86 and x86_64 and expect it to work. I understand the concept of multilib but if you called mkcephfs, which would you expect to actually be executing? I am happy to entertain patches but otherwise not sure there is much I can do on this issue. (feel free to tell me if you think I am delusional)
Because I want to run both 32-bit and 64-bit software depending on the ceph libs (which are provided by the ceph package). Maybe splitting ceph into ceph-libs and ceph would do the trick.
This message is a reminder that Fedora 17 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 17. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '17'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 17's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 17 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 17's end of life. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
Fedora 17 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2013-07-30. Fedora 17 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.