RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 806220 - list of permissive domains is not empty after disabling permissivedomains module
Summary: list of permissive domains is not empty after disabling permissivedomains module
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: selinux-policy
Version: 6.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Miroslav Grepl
QA Contact: Milos Malik
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-03-23 09:05 UTC by Milos Malik
Modified: 2012-06-20 12:32 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version: selinux-policy-3.7.19-144.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
: 1036188 (view as bug list)
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 12:32:29 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0780 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE selinux-policy bug fix and enhancement update 2012-06-19 20:34:59 UTC

Description Milos Malik 2012-03-23 09:05:25 UTC
Description of problem:

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-142.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-minimum-3.7.19-142.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-3.7.19-142.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-doc-3.7.19-142.el6.noarch
selinux-policy-mls-3.7.19-142.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
# sestatus 
SELinux status:                 enabled
SELinuxfs mount:                /selinux
Current mode:                   enforcing
Mode from config file:          enforcing
Policy version:                 24
Policy from config file:        targeted
# semodule -d permissivedomains
# semodule -l | grep permissivedomains
permissivedomains	1.0.0	Disabled
# semanage permissive -l 

Builtin Permissive Types 

deltacloudd_t
mongod_t
iwhd_t
thin_t
#
  
Actual results:
* the list is not empty

Expected results:
* the list is empty

Comment 1 Miroslav Grepl 2012-03-23 09:13:29 UTC
Yes, there was a bug which I fixed. Easy fix.

Comment 2 Miroslav Grepl 2012-04-03 18:36:52 UTC
Fixed in selinux-policy-3.7.19-144.el6

Comment 5 Daniel Walsh 2012-05-02 19:53:59 UTC
Is that something we ship?  Disabling the permissivedomains here will only disable the ones that we ship.  If a user creates a permissive domain or adds one using 

semanage permissive -a bcfg2_t

Then disabling the permissivedomain.pp  file will have no effect.

Comment 6 Miroslav Grepl 2012-05-03 06:44:56 UTC
We don't ship this policy in RHEL6.3.

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 12:32:29 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0780.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.