Bug 809840 - Deleting cloud keeps the image entry in conductor
Summary: Deleting cloud keeps the image entry in conductor
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: CloudForms Cloud Engine
Classification: Retired
Component: aeolus-conductor
Version: 1.0.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
Assignee: Angus Thomas
QA Contact: wes hayutin
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-04-04 13:43 UTC by Rehana
Modified: 2013-01-24 21:32 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-01-24 21:32:06 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
image_detail (207.88 KB, image/png)
2012-04-04 13:43 UTC, Rehana
no flags Details
auto_image_detail (211.84 KB, image/png)
2012-04-04 13:44 UTC, Rehana
no flags Details

Description Rehana 2012-04-04 13:43:55 UTC
Created attachment 575132 [details]
image_detail

Description of problem:


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.login to conductor
2.create new cloud
3.build/push image to this cloud
4. delete the cloud

Actual results:

Observed that the image entry is stilll there but the ami
id and uuid got deleted. keeping this information is of NO USE as user cant do
any operation (rebuild/push)on this image. (PFA: image detail.png)

Also i observed this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798725.
(appears the image details as a result of auto refresh)
(PFA:Auto_image_detail.png)
  

Expected results:
It is also expected to remove the image entry (like name) from conductor

Additional info:

rpm -qa | grep aeolus
rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-12.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-0.8.7-1.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-doc-0.8.7-1.el6.noarch
aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.8.7-1.el6.noarch
aeolus-configure-2.5.2-1.el6.noarch
aeolus-all-0.8.7-1.el6.noarch
rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.3.1-1.el6.noarch

Comment 1 Rehana 2012-04-04 13:44:24 UTC
Created attachment 575133 [details]
auto_image_detail

Comment 3 Mike Orazi 2013-01-24 21:32:06 UTC
This should be addressed when we convert to imgfac2.0/tim.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.