Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 810374
Review Request: xpl4linux - An xPLHub based on xPL framework
Last modified: 2013-05-15 15:26:44 EDT
Spec URL: http://cquad.dyndns.org/hg/xpl4linux/raw-file/13aecad7d3a6/SPECS/xpl4linux.spec
SRPM URL: http://cquad.dyndns.org/hg/xpl4linux/raw-file/13aecad7d3a6/SRPMS/xpl4linux-1.3a-5.fc16.src.rpm
Hi, I just finished packaging up xpl4linux, I would appreciate a review so that I can get it into EL6 and Fedora Extras
xpl4linux is an xPL Hub based on xPL framework that hides most of the details of dealing with xPL.It will handle filtering messages, sending heartbeats, formatting and parsing messages, directing messages to handlers based on where they were bound from, etc.
rpmlint output :
xpl4linux.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) xPLHub
xpl4linux.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) xPL -> x Pl, cpl, pl
xpl4linux.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US xPL -> x Pl, cpl, pl
xpl4linux.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xPLSend
xpl4linux.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xPL_Clock
xpl4linux.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xPL_Logger
xpl4linux.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xPL_ConfigClock
For spelling-error xpl is a protocol.
For no-manual-page, I have only a man page for principal binary xPLHub.
rpmlint is silent for other packages (devel, libs and debug) except same spelling-errors
I am triaging old review tickets. I can't promise a review if you reply, but by closing out the stale tickets we can devote extra attention to the ones which aren't stale.
sprc and srpm links appear to be invalid; I cannot resolve the host.
Those files are now available on :
Spec URL: http://cquad.eu/hg/xpl4linux/raw-file/13aecad7d3a6/SPECS/xpl4linux.spec
SRPM URL: http://cquad.eu/hg/xpl4linux/raw-file/13aecad7d3a6/SRPMS/xpl4linux-1.3a-5.fc16.src.rpm
This package was needed by domogik which I want to package. Now domogik included his own XPL Hub.
xpl4linux is an old project without any new contribution a long time ago.
Perhaps it would be better to close this review ?
I guess I'll go ahead and close this.