Bug 811247 - kabi-whitelists structure changing makes kabi check fail
Summary: kabi-whitelists structure changing makes kabi check fail
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Hardware Certification Program
Classification: Retired
Component: Test Suite (tests)
Version: 1.5
Hardware: All
OS: All
medium
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Greg Nichols
QA Contact: Guangze Bai
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 767775
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-04-10 14:27 UTC by Caspar Zhang
Modified: 2015-02-08 21:38 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
no tech note needed.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-05 21:37:35 UTC

Attachments (Terms of Use)
info test patch to check new location of whitelist. (1.58 KB, patch)
2012-04-18 15:44 UTC, Greg Nichols 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0711 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE v7 bug fix and enhancement update 2012-06-06 01:26:37 UTC

Description Caspar Zhang 2012-04-10 14:27:40 UTC 
Description of problem:

see bug 753771 comment 15, kabi-whitelists path is changed in RHEL6.3, we should use /lib/modules/kabi-current/kabi_whitelist_$arch instead. Also we need to keep compatible with RHEL6.2
Comment 2 Greg Nichols 2012-04-18 15:44:22 UTC 
Created attachment 578400 [details]
info test patch to check new location of whitelist.
Comment 6 Caspar Zhang 2012-06-04 08:04:00 UTC 
    Technical note added. If any revisions are required, please edit the "Technical Notes" field
    accordingly. All revisions will be proofread by the Engineering Content Services team.
    
    New Contents:
no tech note needed.
Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-05 21:37:35 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0711.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.