Bug 813659 - "/etc/init.d/fcoe-target status" are using the oldname "targetadmin", it has been changed to "targetcli"
Summary: "/etc/init.d/fcoe-target status" are using the oldname "targetadmin", it has ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: fcoe-target-utils
Version: 6.3
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Andy Grover
QA Contact: Petr Beňas
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-04-18 07:06 UTC by Gris Ge
Modified: 2015-01-04 23:02 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 13:50:49 UTC
Target Upstream Version:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2012:0854 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE fcoe-target-utils bug fix and enhancement update 2012-06-19 20:48:32 UTC

Description Gris Ge 2012-04-18 07:06:16 UTC
Description of problem:
===
[root@storageqe-03 ~]# /etc/init.d/fcoe-target status 
Use targetadmin to check status.
===

"rpm -ql fcoe-target-utils" show "targetadmin" has been renamed as "targetcli".

Please update "/etc/init.d/fcoe-target 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
fcoe-target-utils-2.0rc1.fb10-3.el6.noarch

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. /etc/init.d/fcoe-target status 

  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
As fcoe-target-utils will get full support in RHEL 6.3. Please fix this before it release.

Comment 4 Petr Beňas 2012-05-21 09:32:21 UTC
Reproduced in fcoe-target-utils-2.0rc1.fb8-2.el6.noarch and verified in fcoe-target-utils-2.0rc1.fb10-5.el6.noarch.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 13:50:49 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0854.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.