Bug 814221 - Split documentation into separate RPM subpackage
Summary: Split documentation into separate RPM subpackage
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7
Classification: Red Hat
Component: sssd
Version: 7.1
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Jakub Hrozek
QA Contact: Kaushik Banerjee
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-04-19 11:56 UTC by Stephen Gallagher
Modified: 2020-05-02 16:51 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-06-17 12:17:16 UTC
Target Upstream Version:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github SSSD sssd issues 2344 0 None None None 2020-05-02 16:51:45 UTC

Description Stephen Gallagher 2012-04-19 11:56:24 UTC 
This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1302

The documentation is starting to get fairly large, with translations. It would be better to separate it into its own subpackage that can be left off of space-constrained install media like LiveCDs.
Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 06:12:55 UTC 
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.
Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-11 02:05:44 UTC 
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.
Comment 5 Martin Kosek 2014-06-17 12:17:16 UTC 
Upstream ticket was closed. Stephen reported:

I was recently made aware of the --excludedocs argument to RPM. This makes it possible to install an RPM without any contents marked as %doc in the spec file. There's no need to split out the documentation into a subpackage.

I've verified that the %lang routines that we use in SSSD produce proper entries labeled as %doc in the final output.


Given this information, I am closing the Bugzilla too.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.