Bug 814987 - FTBFS in EL-7 (solved)
Summary: FTBFS in EL-7 (solved)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rubygem-test-unit
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mamoru TASAKA
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-04-21 21:32 UTC by Matěj Cepl
Modified: 2018-04-11 18:38 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-04-22 05:53:57 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)
suggested patch on .spec file (589 bytes, patch)
2012-04-21 21:32 UTC, Matěj Cepl
no flags Details | Diff

Description Matěj Cepl 2012-04-21 21:32:07 UTC
Created attachment 579225 [details]
suggested patch on .spec file

Description of problem:
spec file has only Fedora conditionals, which don't work on RHEL. see attached patch

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rubygem-test-unit-2.4.5-2.fc17

Comment 1 Mamoru TASAKA 2012-04-22 02:57:03 UTC
Why do I have to modify spec for RHEL 7, of which I can never know the status of development? RHEL status can only be seen by Redhat people, and I can never know what the correct answer is!!

Comment 2 Mamoru TASAKA 2012-04-22 03:00:22 UTC
A more bit explanation:
So I don't know if the spec file you attached is correct because I don't know the status of RHEL. If you need some fix for RHEL7, it should be done internally on Redhat, not on Fedora.

So basically speaking, if people say "your spec file doesn't work on RHEL", I have to say "I don't know because I don't know RHEL". I only care for Fedora.

Comment 3 Matěj Cepl 2012-04-22 05:53:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> A more bit explanation:
> So I don't know if the spec file you attached is correct because I don't know
> the status of RHEL. If you need some fix for RHEL7, it should be done
> internally on Redhat, not on Fedora.

OK, I thought that the suggested fix is self-explaining. But if you don't want to apply it, your call.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.