Bug 816258 - Don't refer to gcc44 as technology preview in RHEL 5
Summary: Don't refer to gcc44 as technology preview in RHEL 5
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: doc-Technical_Notes
Version: 5.9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Eliska Slobodova
QA Contact: ecs-bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-04-25 16:18 UTC by Jeff Law
Modified: 2014-10-04 16:40 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-09-20 12:06:38 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jeff Law 2012-04-25 16:18:27 UTC
Description of problem:
Prior versions of the RHEL 5 release notes have mentioned gcc44 as a tech preview.  gcc44 moved from a tech preview to fully supported in RHEL 5 some time ago.

We want to make sure to not refer to gcc44 as a tech preview in the release notes or any other documentation for RHEL 5, particularly for RHEL 5.9 and future releases.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Douglas Silas 2012-04-25 16:35:23 UTC
Thanks Jeff. Moving to Martin, who owns the RHEL Release and Technical Notes.

Comment 2 Martin Prpič 2012-06-25 10:40:40 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Description of problem:
> Prior versions of the RHEL 5 release notes have mentioned gcc44 as a tech
> preview.  gcc44 moved from a tech preview to fully supported in RHEL 5 some
> time ago.

Jeff, when exactly did gcc44 move out of Tech Preview? Which versions of the Tech Notes do we need to republish to fix this.

Thanks,
Martin

Comment 3 Jeff Law 2012-06-25 15:47:50 UTC
I don't know the exact dates gcc44 went from tech preview to fully supported in RHEL 5, it was probably relatively soon after RHEL 6 was released.  Jakub might know for sure, I've added him to the CC list and hope he can chime in with the correct answer.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.