Bug 81647 - mozilla fails to find jre
Summary: mozilla fails to find jre
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: mozilla   
(Show other bugs)
Version: phoebe
Hardware: i386 Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christopher Blizzard
QA Contact: Ben Levenson
URL: www.earthcam.com
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-01-12 03:58 UTC by John Coonrod
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:49 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-01-15 06:36:37 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description John Coonrod 2003-01-12 03:58:03 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021218

Description of problem:
I downloaded jre1.3 and rpm -i'd it as su, but mozilla fails to see it.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. download and install sun jre 1.3
2. try a java page in mozilla
3.
    

Actual Results:  nada

Expected Results:  expect to see it detect java

Additional info:

Comment 1 Warren Togami 2003-01-12 10:27:36 UTC
Mozilla never will use the Java plugin when you install Java in this way.  You
must always use a symlink.  I think this is NOTABUG, although documentation
could probably be more clear.

If you need help symlinking, please ask any linux user group or phoebe-list.


Comment 2 Larry Troan 2003-03-31 13:58:20 UTC
FROM ISSUE TRACKER....
Event posted 03-14-2003 03:27pm by arunsharma with duration of 0.00       
Need this in Q2 errata to support IA-32 apps. Raising priority to 2.

Event posted 03-17-2003 02:40pm by arunsharma with duration of 0.00
The absence of this code may result in incorrect behavior of IA-32 apps with
respect to large files. We've seeing at least one failure with the Linux test
project.

ALSO ADDING LINK TO ISSUE TRACKER AND COPYING STATUS  

Comment 3 Larry Troan 2003-03-31 14:01:47 UTC
AGH..... WRONG BUGZILLA NUMBER. IGNORE ABOVE....


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.