Description of problem: Compilation on F17/beta, with Java 7: [INFO] Compiling 704 source files to /home/ykaul/ovirt-engine/backend/manager/modules/bll/target/classes [WARNING] /home/ykaul/ovirt-engine/backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/adbroker/KerberosManagerSericeManagmentMBean.java:[3,24] KrbException is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [WARNING] /home/ykaul/ovirt-engine/backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/adbroker/KerberosManager.java:[9,24] Config is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [WARNING] /home/ykaul/ovirt-engine/backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/adbroker/KerberosManager.java:[10,24] KrbException is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [WARNING] /home/ykaul/ovirt-engine/backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/adbroker/KerberosManagerSericeManagmentMBean.java:[8,33] KrbException is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [WARNING] /home/ykaul/ovirt-engine/backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/adbroker/LDAPTemplateWrapper.java:[65,57] LdapCtxFactory is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [WARNING] /home/ykaul/ovirt-engine/backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/adbroker/KerberosManager.java:[87,33] KrbException is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release [WARNING] /home/ykaul/ovirt-engine/backend/manager/modules/bll/src/main/java/org/ovirt/engine/core/bll/adbroker/KerberosManager.java:[92,8] Config is internal proprietary API and may be removed in a future release Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): git hash 8bfff1ff2e61474847312c1799bca8432b9df545 How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info:
yair - thoughts?
Yair - Is this bug still relevant ?
(In reply to Barak from comment #3) > Yair - Is this bug still relevant ? Relevant. Not sure how much it's worth the hassle though. We can start changing the code (mainly method extraction refactoring) and add annotations to ignore the warnings, etc... But do we really want to do that?
Closing old bugs. If this issue is still relevant/important in current version, please re-open the bug.