Bug 818356 - incorrect clock blocks installation
Summary: incorrect clock blocks installation
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: None
Product: oVirt
Classification: Retired
Component: ovirt-node
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
unspecified
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Fabian Deutsch
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 947533
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-05-02 20:31 UTC by luke.varnadore
Modified: 2016-04-26 20:12 UTC (History)
8 users (show)

Fixed In Version: 2.7.0
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-04-09 11:01:21 UTC
oVirt Team: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description luke.varnadore 2012-05-02 20:31:02 UTC
Description of problem:
stale hardware clock causes systemd to fsck the read only filesystem in the installer environment

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.3.0 fc16

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.Set hardware clock outside the fsck window
2.Boot ovirt-node-iso
3.Watch in horror as it tries to fsck a read only filesystem and then dies
  
Actual results:
Dead installer

Expected results:
Installer succeeds 

Additional info:
I used hwclock to correct the date and it installs fine.

Comment 1 Fabian Deutsch 2013-02-14 14:03:25 UTC
Mike,

should we take care of this situation? The only Node specific bit I see with this problem is that fsck fails because we've got a ro rootfs.

Comment 2 Mike Burns 2013-02-14 16:23:52 UTC
Do you have a proposed solution?  Do we even know if this is still an issue?

Comment 3 Fabian Deutsch 2013-04-02 16:44:19 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Do you have a proposed solution?  Do we even know if this is still an issue?

I believe this issue is a generic issue related to fsck - and not to Node.
What I could think of is that fsck / systemd should take care of such a situation.

I've created an upstream bug 947533 to see what they say.

Comment 4 Fabian Deutsch 2013-04-04 11:39:34 UTC
Luke,

can you still reproduce this with 2.6.0?
I couldn't on a first try.

Comment 5 Fabian Deutsch 2013-04-09 11:01:21 UTC
No response from the reporter and I'm also not able to reproduce it therefor closig this.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.