Description of problem: When trying to launch an AppForm in which the following characteristics are in place, it fails with the error: Error: Failed to launch following component blueprints: student9-componentoutline-template500: Parameter name must e 50 characters or less Characteristics compnent outline: student9-componentoutline-template blueprint: student9-blueprint appform name: student9-appform1
Checked this out and it is there... I remembered seeing bug 773402 but that covers the deployment name field being more than 50 characters That same check needs to include the appended component outline name (plus the slash) when checking the length
Angus, this looks like a low-risk fix -- if so, let's put it on the list for Z. If not please clear the 1.0.z flag.
I tried to reproduce that bug, but I could not. I attached a screenshot of successful starting Application. Component outline: student9-componentoutline-template Blueprint: student9-blueprint Application name: student9-blueprint2 Tested on 1.0.1 branch, last commit # 8552fa5732edad7f7b0ae059eb2ba7368f992aeb I've set NEEDINFO tag in this BZ.
Created attachment 587418 [details] successful start of application
This issue is not reproducible. application started successfully. see attached screenshot. Base of Dave's comment a check is required for component outline name if the name is more the 50 characters. To track this issue i have logged:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829291 verified: rpm -qa | grep aeolus aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.13.8-1.el6cf.noarch rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.7.1-1.el6cf.noarch aeolus-configure-2.8.6-1.el6cf.noarch rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-12.el6.noarch aeolus-conductor-0.13.8-1.el6cf.noarch aeolus-conductor-doc-0.13.8-1.el6cf.noarch aeolus-all-0.13.8-1.el6cf.noarch
Created attachment 616466 [details] app launched
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-1516.html