Bug 824559 - Protocol spec without prior Class and Subclass spec at line 4297
Summary: Protocol spec without prior Class and Subclass spec at line 4297
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5
Classification: Red Hat
Component: hwdata
Version: 5.8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Karsten Hopp
QA Contact: Aleš Mareček
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 743405
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-05-23 18:07 UTC by Jeff Bastian
Modified: 2018-11-28 20:38 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-01-08 07:44:38 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
patch to remove Samsung Galaxy Ace device from usb.ids (510 bytes, patch)
2012-05-23 18:52 UTC, Jeff Bastian 		no flags Details | Diff
View All


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Knowledge Base (Solution) 128093 0 None None None 2012-06-08 19:22:41 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0101 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE hwdata bug fix and enhancement update 2013-01-07 15:26:18 UTC

Description Jeff Bastian 2012-05-23 18:07:29 UTC 
Description of problem:
lsusb reports an error:
Protocol spec without prior Class and Subclass spec at line 4297

Line 4297 of /usr/share/hwdata/usb.ids contains:
                04e8 689e  GT-S5830 (Samsung Galaxy Ace)


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
hwdata-0.213.26-1.el5.noarch

How reproducible:
every time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. lsusb
  
Actual results:
Protocol spec without prior Class and Subclass spec at line 4297

Expected results:
no error

Additional info:
Comment 1 Jeff Bastian 2012-05-23 18:10:39 UTC 
The error does not happen with hwdata-0.213.25-1.el5 so it's a recent change that introduced the bug.
Comment 2 Jeff Bastian 2012-05-23 18:52:03 UTC 
Created attachment 586430 [details]
patch to remove Samsung Galaxy Ace device from usb.ids

The RHEL 6 usb.ids file does not have the offending line, so I think the easiest fix is to simply remove that line.
Comment 10 errata-xmlrpc 2013-01-08 07:44:38 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0101.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.