Bug 83267 - leaked error message on upgrade
Summary: leaked error message on upgrade
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Public Beta
Classification: Retired
Component: ttfonts-ja   
(Show other bugs)
Version: phoebe
Hardware: i386 Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nakai
QA Contact: Bill Huang
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends On:
Blocks: 79578
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-02-01 04:54 UTC by R P Herrold
Modified: 2007-04-18 16:50 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-02-13 10:36:41 UTC
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description R P Herrold 2003-02-01 04:54:46 UTC
This file not present error in the post install script is leaking an error
message -- a better fix would be to test for the existence of this (seemingly
old) file, before using it.


ttfonts-ja 100 % done
/usr/share/fonts/ja/TrueType /
sh: line 1: /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/encodings/microsoft-win3.1.enc: No such
file or directory
/


This bug similar to, but different from  83192

Comment 1 Nakai 2003-02-05 08:47:52 UTC
There is microsoft-win3.1.enc file in phoebe beta4, and
ttfonts-ja don't use that file directly.

$ rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/encodings/microsoft-win3.1.enc
XFree86-base-fonts-4.2.99.3-20030115.0
$ rpm -qf /usr/X11R6/bin/mkfontdir
XFree86-font-utils-4.2.99.3-20030115.0

I don't think this warning might happen on an usual environment.
Could you describe the detail set of yours? X, Red Hat Linux versions, etc..



Comment 2 R P Herrold 2003-02-05 15:30:59 UTC
stock RHL 8.0 with updates, going to Phoebe II

Comment 3 Leon Ho 2003-02-07 05:04:44 UTC
Here is what i got in when installing rawhide ttfonts-ja in Phoebe: 
 
Preparing...                
########################################### 
[100%] 
   1:ttfonts-ja             
########################################### 
[100%] 
[root@reflex BUILD]# 
 

Comment 4 Matt Wilson 2003-02-12 04:27:37 UTC
this should be fine now - can someone else verify?


Comment 5 Nakai 2003-02-13 10:36:41 UTC
Fixed in the latest ttfonts-ja now


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.