Bug 837051 - Agent RPM - no agent rpm for rhel5
Summary: Agent RPM - no agent rpm for rhel5
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: RHQ Project
Classification: Other
Component: Agent
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
high
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: RHQ Project Maintainer
QA Contact: Mike Foley
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 837381
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-07-02 15:35 UTC by Armine Hovsepyan
Modified: 2015-09-03 00:01 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-05-06 19:15:30 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Armine Hovsepyan 2012-07-02 15:35:27 UTC
Description of problem:
no agent rpm for rhel5 is ready.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
org.jboss.on-jboss-on-parent-3.1.0.GA-8

As a jon customer I want agent rpm installation file to be ready for rhel5.

As discussed, it will be ready for 3.1.1 version.

Comment 1 Charles Crouch 2012-07-03 16:00:45 UTC
Question from Larry/Deon: Can we use "noarch" to avoid creating to different 
sets of rpms for rhel5 vs 6?

Comment 3 Stefan Negrea 2012-07-05 18:11:38 UTC
All JON RPMs are created with noarch moniker. However, the current brew build target is setup for RHEL6. That means all the RPMs are signed for RHEL6 and they are build with a RHEL6 specific environment. 

RPMs that are unsigned or signed with the wrong certificate cannot be published through the errata process. That means the current RHEL6 RPMs cannot be published in RHEL5 channels. In order get RHEL5 RPMs, we would need to setup a RHEL5 brew tag and re-run the RPM packaging process.

Comment 4 John Sanda 2012-08-02 18:51:56 UTC
JON 3.1.1 ER1 build is available. Moving to ON_QA.

https://brewweb.devel.redhat.com/buildinfo?buildID=226942

Comment 6 Charles Crouch 2012-08-29 16:21:33 UTC
As per 8/20 triage marking as an RFE

Comment 7 Stefan Negrea 2014-05-06 19:15:30 UTC
Fixed a looong time ago!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.