RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 837808 - TUI: better to display proxy and proxy port separately after register to RHN with proxy
Summary: TUI: better to display proxy and proxy port separately after register to RHN ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-node
Version: 6.3
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Joey Boggs
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-07-05 11:02 UTC by haiyang,dong
Modified: 2016-04-26 15:40 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ovirt-node-2.5.0-5.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Previously, a Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Hypervisor node that registered with Red Hat Network using a proxy displayed the URI and port of the proxy server in the same field, leaving the "Port" field blank. Now, the proxy server's address and port are displayed separately in their respective fields.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-02-28 16:37:41 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
screenshot of Red Hat Network Page (49.45 KB, image/png)
2012-07-05 11:02 UTC, haiyang,dong
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2013:0556 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE ovirt-node bug fix and enhancement update 2013-02-28 21:29:06 UTC

Description haiyang,dong 2012-07-05 11:02:44 UTC
Created attachment 596378 [details]
screenshot of Red Hat Network Page

Description of problem:
After register to RHN with proxy, the "proxy:proxy port" displays in the Server label,the Port label is blank.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhev-hypervisor6-6.3-20120702.0.el6_3

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RHEV-H.
2. Enter Red Hat Network menu.
3. Register RHEV-H to RHN with proxy.
4. Press the "apply" button direct
4. After register to RHN successfully,focus on  Red Hat Network Page(Red Hat Network Page.png).

Actual results:
After register to RHN with proxy, the "proxy:proxy port" displays in the Server label,the Port label is blank.


Expected results:
Better to display proxy and proxy port separately after register to RHN with proxy

Additional info:

--

Comment 2 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-10 06:32:46 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2012-07-11 01:52:06 UTC
This request was erroneously removed from consideration in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4, which is currently under development.  This request will be evaluated for inclusion in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.4.

Comment 9 errata-xmlrpc 2013-02-28 16:37:41 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-0556.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.