Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1.create a new user group name. 2.edit the user group name. 3. Actual results: User Group name displayed outside the form in edit user group page.see attached screenshot. Expected results: should not be displayed. Additional info: rpm -qa | grep aeolus aeolus-conductor-0.11.0-0.20120711193423gitd22a075.fc16.noarch rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.6.0-0.20120711153513gite2a391a.fc16.noarch rubygem-aeolus-image-0.6.0-0.20120711153448git05a815a.fc16.noarch aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.11.0-0.20120711193423gitd22a075.fc16.noarch aeolus-configure-2.7.0-0.20120711153505gite93c068.fc16.noarch aeolus-all-0.11.0-0.20120711193423gitd22a075.fc16.noarch aeolus-conductor-doc-0.11.0-0.20120711193423gitd22a075.fc16.noarch aeolus-conductor-devel-0.11.0-0.20120711193423gitd22a075.fc16.noarch
Created attachment 597707 [details] group name
Patch on list: [PATCH conductor] bug 839474: extraneous group name text in edit form
commit 379eb1292f46aebeab5090353da03278ddbe019f Author: Scott Seago <sseago> Date: Thu Aug 30 15:28:39 2012 -0400 bug 839474: extraneous group name text in edit form https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839474 Remove extra group name h2 text from haml. Signed-off-by: Jason Guiditta <jguiditt> On 1.1 at: 0b68ca22222711b8a3003bfc264f11ace1f73de8
in build aeolus-conductor-0.13.3-1.el6cf
Extraneous group name text in edit form removed. verified: rpm -qa | grep aeolus aeolus-conductor-0.13.7-1.el6cf.noarch aeolus-all-0.13.7-1.el6cf.noarch rubygem-aeolus-cli-0.7.1-1.el6cf.noarch aeolus-conductor-doc-0.13.7-1.el6cf.noarch aeolus-configure-2.8.6-1.el6cf.noarch rubygem-aeolus-image-0.3.0-12.el6.noarch aeolus-conductor-daemons-0.13.7-1.el6cf.noarch
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-1516.html