Bug 847812 - webadmin: when expending the disk under the storage -> vm's sub tab -> disk, the actual size is reported incorrectly
Summary: webadmin: when expending the disk under the storage -> vm's sub tab -> disk, ...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-engine-webadmin-portal
Version: 3.1.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
high
high
Target Milestone: ---
: 3.1.0
Assignee: Tal Nisan
QA Contact: Leonid Natapov
URL:
Whiteboard: storage
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-08-13 15:52 UTC by Dafna Ron
Modified: 2016-02-10 19:12 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version: SI19
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-12-04 19:59:43 UTC
oVirt Team: Storage
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
logs (823.57 KB, application/x-gzip)
2012-08-13 15:52 UTC, Dafna Ron
no flags Details

Description Dafna Ron 2012-08-13 15:52:52 UTC
Created attachment 604034 [details]
logs

Description of problem:

when expending the vm's disk under the storage tab -> select storage -> vm's tab -> expend disk, the size is reported incorrectly. 
in block device the actual size should always be equal to the virtual size. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

si13.2

How reproducible:

100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a vm with 10GB preallocated disk
2. go to storage tab -> select storage domain -> vm's sub tab -> expend the disk
3.
  
Actual results:

the disk which is unexpended is showing the correct virtual and actual size (which is 10GB) but when expanding the disk we are reporting virtual size as 10GB and actual size as 1GB 

Expected results:

in block device the actual size should always be equal to the virtual size. 

Additional info: screen shot + logs

Comment 1 Ayal Baron 2012-08-13 21:32:40 UTC
Dup of 847800?

Comment 2 Dafna Ron 2012-08-22 11:08:37 UTC
I'm not sure. 
it depends if the reason we are showing incorrect information on these two tabs is caused by the same issue which is something we need to check in the code. 
so basically this is your call... 

just once thing though, if indeed its the same issue, we just need to make sure that the bug closed as dup will have a comment for qe to check both locations when verifying :)

Comment 3 Tal Nisan 2012-09-19 16:06:10 UTC
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/8063/

Comment 5 Dafna Ron 2012-09-27 10:26:28 UTC
verified on si19


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.