Bug 858431 - ctdb crash on unrelated node, when simulating repeated server loss
Summary: ctdb crash on unrelated node, when simulating repeated server loss
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: glusterd
Version: 2.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
high
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Christopher R. Hertel
QA Contact: Sudhir D
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 842634
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-09-18 22:21 UTC by Scott Haines
Modified: 2015-01-22 15:29 UTC (History)
10 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 842634
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-09-23 22:39:12 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Comment 2 Christopher R. Hertel 2012-11-30 01:57:00 UTC
Assigning to QE for regression testing.
Possibly fixed by a GlusterFS patch.  See bug 869724.

Comment 3 surabhi 2013-07-10 07:02:28 UTC
Verified on latest version:

glusterfs 3.4.0.12rhs.beta3 built on Jul  6 2013 14:35:17

[root@dhcp159-134 ~]# rpm -qa | grep ctdb
ctdb-debuginfo-1.0.114.6-1.el6rhs.x86_64
ctdb-devel-1.0.114.6-1.el6rhs.x86_64
ctdb-1.0.114.6-1.el6rhs.x86_64


On multiple reboots and reboot one by one of each node didn't cause ctdb to crash and it recovered every time.

Comment 5 Scott Haines 2013-09-23 22:39:12 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. 

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1262.html

Comment 6 Scott Haines 2013-09-23 22:43:41 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. 

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1262.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.