Bug 86252 - Kernel rpm does not compile on i686 because of installed but unpackaged files
Summary: Kernel rpm does not compile on i686 because of installed but unpackaged files
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Linux
Classification: Retired
Component: kernel
Version: 8.0
Hardware: i686
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Arjan van de Ven
QA Contact: Brian Brock
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2003-03-18 06:42 UTC by Horms
Modified: 2005-10-31 22:00 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-09-30 15:40:39 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
Spec patch that should resolve this problem (274 bytes, patch)
2003-03-18 06:43 UTC, Horms
no flags Details | Diff

Description Horms 2003-03-18 06:42:04 UTC
Description of problem:

Kernel rpm does not compile on i686

Tested

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

kernel-2.4.18-27.8.0.src.rpm and 
kernel-2.4.18-24.8.0.src.rpm

How reproducible:

Try and build these packages for the i686 target on a Red Hat 8.0
with the latest updates.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -hUv kernel-2.4.18-27.8.0.src.rpm
2. cd /usr/src/redhat/SPECS
3. rpmbuild -ba --target i686 kernel-2.4.spec
    
Actual results:

Build fails complaining about lots of files in
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/src/linux-%{KVERREL}/savedheaders
being installed but not part of the package.

(this isn't a problem with the version of rpm shipped with Red Hat 7.x)

Expected results:

Binary kernel rpms


Additional info:

The attached patch to the kernel-2.4.spec file should resove the problem
by making sure that $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/src/linux-%{KVERREL}/savedheaders
is cleared before packaging.

By the looks of things this will also effect i586 and sparc64.

Also suggest that binary rpms for 8.0 are built in a standard
8.0 environment so these bugs are caught in future.

Comment 1 Horms 2003-03-18 06:43:54 UTC
Created attachment 90636 [details]
Spec patch that should resolve this problem

Comment 2 Bugzilla owner 2004-09-30 15:40:39 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. However, Red Hat no longer maintains this version of
the product. Please upgrade to the latest version and open a new bug if the problem
persists.

The Fedora Legacy project (http://fedoralegacy.org/) maintains some older releases, 
and if you believe this bug is interesting to them, please report the problem in
the bug tracker at: http://bugzilla.fedora.us/



Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.