RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 866779 - RFE: Processor Aggregator Device is not stable causing FW-OS communication to stop
Summary: RFE: Processor Aggregator Device is not stable causing FW-OS communication to...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: kernel
Version: 6.3
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
low
high
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Kernel Manager
QA Contact: Red Hat Kernel QE team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: 961026 1002711 1164899
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-10-16 06:42 UTC by jcpunk
Modified: 2018-11-29 19:20 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2015-09-18 13:55:25 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Linux Kernel 42981 0 None None None 2012-10-16 06:42:49 UTC

Description jcpunk 2012-10-16 06:42:49 UTC
From upstream bug report:


Processors' Idling, as defined in "Processor Aggregator Device" chapter of ACPI
4.0a spec, isn't stable, it doesn't handle big changes of the active cores
well. Slow changes (e.g. 2 cores idled or activated every second) are OK, but
drastic changes of the number of active cores cause whole FW-OS communication
to stop (communication using ACPI defined interface). It happens especially
when bigger number of cores (8 or more) is reactivated.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
I've tested it using kernel 2.6.32 and newer, e.g. 3.1.4 with the same results.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Request OS to idle 8 or more cores as described in "Processor Aggregator
Device" chapter of ACPI 4.0a spec.
2. Request OS to make all cores active.
3. Repeat steps with bigger number of cores to idle if necessary.
Actual Results:  
Cores are active again but communication with the firmware using ASL code is
stopped, no _OST response from OS. power_saving processes are hanging.


Expected Results:  
Cores are active again.



Other details:
Patch in upstream bug merged into main line kernel

Comment 2 Jim Faulkner 2012-12-12 20:46:54 UTC
This is also discussed here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1035216

and here:
http://en.community.dell.com/support-forums/servers/f/1466/t/19456558.aspx

The latter link offers some workaround possibilities.

Comment 3 RHEL Program Management 2012-12-16 06:50:48 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 4 RHEL Program Management 2013-10-14 04:44:22 UTC
This request was not resolved in time for the current release.
Red Hat invites you to ask your support representative to
propose this request, if still desired, for consideration in
the next release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

Comment 6 Chris Williams 2015-09-18 13:55:25 UTC
This Bugzilla has been reviewed by Red Hat and is not planned on being addressed in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 and therefore will be closed. If this bug is critical to production systems, please contact your Red Hat support representative and provide sufficient business justification.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.