RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.
Bug 911835 - Automated Installation parameters miss "AES-NI" and "NFSv4"
Summary: Automated Installation parameters miss "AES-NI" and "NFSv4"
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
Classification: Red Hat
Component: ovirt-node
Version: 6.5
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
medium
medium
Target Milestone: rc
: ---
Assignee: Ryan Barry
QA Contact: Virtualization Bugs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-02-16 08:59 UTC by cshao
Modified: 2014-01-21 19:26 UTC (History)
14 users (show)

Fixed In Version: ovirt-node-3.0.1-5.el6
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
AES-NI and NFSv4 could show on the TUI in the hypervisor, but were missing in automated installation parameters. AES-NI and NFSv4 are now included in automated installation parameters.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-01-21 19:26:42 UTC
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHBA-2014:0033 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE ovirt-node bug fix and enhancement update 2014-01-22 00:14:30 UTC
oVirt gerrit 18455 0 None None None Never

Description cshao 2013-02-16 08:59:38 UTC 
Description of problem:
AES-NI and NFSv4 can show on TUI in RHEV-H, but miss in automated 
Installation parameters.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rhev-hypervisor6-6.4-20130214.0.el6

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:
AES-NI and NFSv4 can show on TUI in RHEV-H, but miss in automated 
Installation parameters.

Expected results:
"AES-NI" and "NFSv4" are included in automated installation parameters.

Additional info:
Comment 7 cshao 2013-10-28 09:57:39 UTC 
Test version:
rhevh-6.5-20131024.1.0.iso
ovirt-node-3.0.1-6.el6.noarch

Auto with below parameters can successfully.
BOOTIF=em1 storage_init=/dev/sda nfsv4_domain=domainname disable_aes_ni=y firstboot

"AES-NI" and "NFSv4" are included in automated installation parameters. So the bug is fixed, change bug status to VERIFIED.
Comment 10 Cheryn Tan 2013-11-08 00:37:14 UTC 
This bug is currently attached to errata RHBA-2013:15277. If this change is not to be documented in the text for this errata please either remove it from the errata, set the requires_doc_text flag to minus (-), or leave a "Doc Text" value of "--no tech note required" if you do not have permission to alter the flag.

Otherwise to aid in the development of relevant and accurate release documentation, please fill out the "Doc Text" field above with these four (4) pieces of information:

* Cause: What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present.
* Consequence: What happens when the bug presents.
* Fix: What was done to fix the bug.
* Result: What now happens when the actions or circumstances above occur. (NB: this is not the same as 'the bug doesn't present anymore')

Once filled out, please set the "Doc Type" field to the appropriate value for the type of change made and submit your edits to the bug.

For further details on the Cause, Consequence, Fix, Result format please refer to:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#cf_release_notes 

Thanks in advance.
Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2014-01-21 19:26:42 UTC 
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0033.html
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.