RHEL Engineering is moving the tracking of its product development work on RHEL 6 through RHEL 9 to Red Hat Jira (issues.redhat.com). If you're a Red Hat customer, please continue to file support cases via the Red Hat customer portal. If you're not, please head to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira and file new tickets here. Individual Bugzilla bugs in the statuses "NEW", "ASSIGNED", and "POST" are being migrated throughout September 2023. Bugs of Red Hat partners with an assigned Engineering Partner Manager (EPM) are migrated in late September as per pre-agreed dates. Bugs against components "kernel", "kernel-rt", and "kpatch" are only migrated if still in "NEW" or "ASSIGNED". If you cannot log in to RH Jira, please consult article #7032570. That failing, please send an e-mail to the RH Jira admins at rh-issues@redhat.com to troubleshoot your issue as a user management inquiry. The email creates a ServiceNow ticket with Red Hat. Individual Bugzilla bugs that are migrated will be moved to status "CLOSED", resolution "MIGRATED", and set with "MigratedToJIRA" in "Keywords". The link to the successor Jira issue will be found under "Links", have a little "two-footprint" icon next to it, and direct you to the "RHEL project" in Red Hat Jira (issue links are of type "https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-XXXX", where "X" is a digit). This same link will be available in a blue banner at the top of the page informing you that that bug has been migrated.

This bug is created as a clone of upstream ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1845

libsss_sudo and libsss_autofs are separate packages that contain just a single client library with no additional dependencies. This separation comes from the F-17 timeframe where the feature was really just a tech preview so we didn't want it to be packaged in sssd proper. On the other hand users are getting regularly confused about "sudo not working" when all they really miss is the single library.

I think we should move these libraries into the main sssd package. There is also libsss_sudo-devel that contains documentation on the API but I don't think we need to keep building it by default. It's not a 3rd party API.

Fixed upstream.

Temporarily moving bugs to MODIFIED to work around errata tool bug

Verified the bug on SSSD Version : sssd-1.11.2-10.el7.x86_64

Verified the sssd.spec file for the following information:

### Provides ###
Provides: libsss_sudo = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: libsss_sudo <= 1.10.0-7%{?dist}.beta1
Provides: libsss_sudo-devel = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: libsss_sudo-devel <= 1.10.0-7%{?dist}.beta1
Provides: libsss_autofs = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: libsss_autofs <= 1.10.0-7%{?dist}.beta1

This request was resolved in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.0.

Contact your manager or support representative in case you have further questions about the request.