Bug 958396 - Guided Decision table: Multiple 'otherwise' for sub-group support
Summary: Guided Decision table: Multiple 'otherwise' for sub-group support
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: JBoss BRMS Platform 6
Classification: Retired
Component: Business Central
Version: 5.x.x
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: manstis
QA Contact: Jiri Locker
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-05-01 10:03 UTC by Toshiya Kobayashi
Modified: 2020-03-27 20:05 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of: 864318
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-27 20:05:43 UTC
Type: Feature Request
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Issue Tracker GUVNOR-1954 0 Major Open Guided Decision table: Multiple 'otherwise' for sub-group support 2016-01-22 13:35:29 UTC

Description Toshiya Kobayashi 2013-05-01 10:03:04 UTC
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #864318 +++

Description of problem:

Platform BZ for https://issues.jboss.org/browse/GUVNOR-1954

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Import repository_export_otherwise.xml attached in GUVNOR-1954
2. Open dt1 decision table
3. View Source
  
Actual results:

rule "Row 3 dt1" and rule "Row 6 dt1" have

Airline not in ( "A Airlines", "B Airways", "C Airlines" )

Expected results:

rule "Row 3 dt1" has
Airline not in ( "A Airlines", "B Airways" )

rule "Row 6 dt1" has

Airline not in ( "B Airways", "C Airlines" )

--- Additional comment from JBoss JIRA Server on 2012-10-28 23:16:14 EDT ---

Toshiya Kobayashi <tkobayas> made a comment on jira GUVNOR-1954

Suggested workaround: splitting the single decision table into smaller ones; each needing only a single "otherwise".

--- Additional comment from Geoffrey De Smet on 2013-03-05 08:40:01 EST ---

Reassign to the guvnor team, now that I am working full time on planner. So these issues aren't forgotten.

Comment 1 manstis 2013-08-02 13:39:24 UTC
This will not be completed for 6.0.x.

Comment 2 Prakash Aradhya 2013-08-06 19:51:43 UTC
Mike, can you take a look at this issue and see if ti can be fixed in 6.0 ?
The work around is a little frustrating.

Comment 3 Lukáš Petrovický 2013-10-17 06:05:41 UTC
qa_ack- as there can be no more feature requests.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.