Bug 961233 - Suspend does not work from Gnome Shell menu
Summary: Suspend does not work from Gnome Shell menu
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 960782
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: systemd
Version: 19
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: systemd-maint
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-05-09 08:09 UTC by Ulrich Hobelmann
Modified: 2013-05-13 06:02 UTC (History)
16 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-05-13 06:02:08 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ulrich Hobelmann 2013-05-09 08:09:24 UTC
Description of problem:
Clicking suspend in the Gnome Shell user status menu does not work. (Likewise: hibernation, when the alternate status menu extension is installed.)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gnome-shell 3.8.1-4.fc19 x86_64

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Open the user menu.
2. Press Alt.
3. Click suspend.
  
Actual results:
The lock screen appears and the screen dims to minimum brightness.

Expected results:
The computer suspends completely.

Additional info:
pm-suspend works, so it's not the other components. dmesg doesn't seem to provide any info. Looks like the hardware layer doesn't even get the memo.

Comment 1 Florian Müllner 2013-05-10 17:21:23 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> Steps to Reproduce:
> 1. Open the user menu.
> 2. Press Alt.
> 3. Click suspend.
>   
> Actual results:
> The lock screen appears and the screen dims to minimum brightness.

OK, so this doesn't sound like a gnome-shell issue then. The "suspend" menu item asks logind to suspend, and nothing else. The screen being locked means that logind signals us that we are about to suspend, so everything is working fine up to that point. What happens after we (successfully!) request suspending is out of our control, so reassigning to systemd.

Comment 2 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2013-05-10 17:36:33 UTC
What systemd version do you have? If you have systemd-203, does it help if you create an empty file /etc/systemd/sleep.conf (sudo touch /etc/systemd/sleep.conf)?

Comment 3 Philipp Dreimann 2013-05-11 20:59:29 UTC
The latest updates fixed the issue for me without touching sleep.conf.

Comment 4 Ulrich Hobelmann 2013-05-12 16:33:01 UTC
Same here. With systemd-204-2 it works.

Comment 5 Michal Schmidt 2013-05-13 06:02:08 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 960782 ***


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.