Bug 961259 - Wrong description about 'posixfs'
Summary: Wrong description about 'posixfs'
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager
Classification: Red Hat
Component: Documentation
Version: 3.5.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
unspecified
medium
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Stephen Gordon
QA Contact: Stephen Gordon
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-05-09 09:23 UTC by Humble Chirammal
Modified: 2015-09-22 13:09 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-08-27 01:38:10 UTC
oVirt Team: ---
Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Humble Chirammal 2013-05-09 09:23:23 UTC 
Description of problem:

In section : 3.1.3. Types Of Storage Backing Storage Domains:

It has mentioned:

--snip-- from NOTE --
It is possible to use any POSIX compliant networked filesystem as a storage domain, none but NFS are supported. 
--/snip--


Afaict, glusterfs or "any posixfs" should be part of it.. 

If you agree, please correct the doc to reflect it..


Second : Spelling mistake on "filed based storage.":


3.1.3. Types Of Storage Backing Storage Domains
Storage domains can be implemented using block based and filed based storage. 
filed based storage.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

N/A

How reproducible:

N/A

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Tim Hildred 2013-05-09 09:49:31 UTC 
Hey Humble, 

I've fixed both of those. POSIX filesystem support covers NFS and Red Hat Storage (gluster), and thats all. 

I caught that typo, and another one. I've fixed them, and will change to ON_QA when I stage.
Comment 2 Humble Chirammal 2013-05-09 10:14:11 UTC 
Hey Tim,

Thanks for the quick response!! much appreciated..
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.