Bug 964045 - longevity: Confusing error messages in posix.c:154:posix_lookup
Summary: longevity: Confusing error messages in posix.c:154:posix_lookup
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat Storage
Component: glusterd
Version: 2.0
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
medium
low
Target Milestone: ---
: ---
Assignee: Bug Updates Notification Mailing List
QA Contact: storage-qa-internal@redhat.com
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-05-17 06:56 UTC by Vijaykumar Koppad
Modified: 2015-03-23 07:40 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed:
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Vijaykumar Koppad 2013-05-17 06:56:32 UTC
Description of problem:
[2013-05-13 16:14:59.203989] E [posix-helpers.c:420:posix_pstat] 0-long1-posix: lstat failed on /bricks/long1_brick0/ and return value is 5 instead of -1. Please see dmesg output to check whether the failure is due to backend filesystem issue
[2013-05-13 16:14:59.204065] E [posix.c:154:posix_lookup] 0-long1-posix: lstat on /bricks/long1_brick0/ failed: Success
[2013-05-13 16:14:59.204117] E [posix-helpers.c:420:posix_pstat] 0-long1-posix: lstat failed on /bricks/long1_brick0/ and return value is 5 instead of -1. Please see dmesg output to check whether the failure is due to backend filesystem issue

"lstat on /bricks/long1_brick0/ failed: Success"  this is confusing log message.



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):glusterfs-3.3.0.7rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64


How reproducible: It was happened in longevity test-run. 

Steps to Reproduce:

It was observed while debugging for the Bug 964038 

(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964038)
  

Actual results: failed: Success was logged


Expected results: It should be something logical. 


Additional info:

Comment 3 Vivek Agarwal 2015-03-23 07:39:48 UTC
The product version of Red Hat Storage on which this issue was reported has reached End Of Life (EOL) [1], hence this bug report is being closed. If the issue is still observed on a current version of Red Hat Storage, please file a new bug report on the current version.







[1] https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0821.html

Comment 4 Vivek Agarwal 2015-03-23 07:40:25 UTC
The product version of Red Hat Storage on which this issue was reported has reached End Of Life (EOL) [1], hence this bug report is being closed. If the issue is still observed on a current version of Red Hat Storage, please file a new bug report on the current version.







[1] https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2014-0821.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.