Spec URL: http://cicku.me/wemux.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/wemux-3.1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: wemux enhances tmux to make multi-user terminal multiplexing both easier and more powerful. It allows users to host a wemux server and have clients join in either: Mirror Mode gives clients (another SSH user on your machine) read-only access to the session, allowing them to see you work, or Pair Mode allows the client and yourself to work in the same terminal (shared cursor) Rogue Mode allows the client to pair or work independently in another window (separate cursors) in the same tmux session. It features multi-server support as well as user listing and notifications when users attach/detach. Fedora Account System Username: cicku
Hi @cicku, I'm tmux user, would be very nice to have this in fedora ;) The github's sources present differs with your package, resulting in upstream MD5sum check error, if the upstream does no create tarballs for release, please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Github for handling sources. Please don't use wilcards to list an unique file. expand it with the complete name Cheers.
Spec URL: http://cicku.me/wemux.spec SRPM URL: http://cicku.me/wemux-2.2.0-1.fc20.src.rpm
Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. makerpm@echevemaster wemux-9bff23720d09a910dacad101c18d0f4512ae375a$ licensecheck MIT-LICENSE MIT-LICENSE: MIT/X11 (BSD like) [x]: Package consistently uses macro is (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified. [x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: No %config files under /usr. [x]: Package do not use a name that already exist [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Rpmlint ------- Checking: wemux-2.2.0-1.fc20.noarch.rpm wemux.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi -> mulch, mufti wemux.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti wemux.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary wemux 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- # rpmlint wemux wemux.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) multi -> mulch, mufti wemux.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. # echo 'rpmlint-done:' Requires -------- wemux (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /usr/bin/env config(wemux) tmux Provides -------- wemux: config(wemux) wemux Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/zolrath/wemux/archive/9bff23720d09a910dacad101c18d0f4512ae375a/wemux-2.2.0-9bff237.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 8961644c711f9c3f028d8d3f72a1fa1ae9c67e2db43eed8f5538733d5096ae54 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 8961644c711f9c3f028d8d3f72a1fa1ae9c67e2db43eed8f5538733d5096ae54 Generated by fedora-review 0.4.1 (b2e211f) last change: 2013-04-29 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 967187 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 - For upcoming reviews, please bump the release number each time you make changes in the spec -Before importing please add the comment "Nothing to build" below of %build ---------------- PACKAGE APPROVED ----------------
New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: wemux Short Description: A tool help improve multi-user terminal multiplexing Owners: cicku Branches: f18 f19 el6
Git done (by process-git-requests).
wemux-2.2.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wemux-2.2.0-1.fc19
wemux-2.2.0-1.fc18 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 18. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wemux-2.2.0-1.fc18
wemux-2.2.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wemux-2.2.0-1.el6
wemux-2.2.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.
wemux-2.2.0-1.fc18 has been pushed to the Fedora 18 stable repository.
wemux-2.2.0-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.
wemux-2.2.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.
Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: wemux New Branches: epel7 Owners: cicku