Bug 968278 - License should be MIT or Ruby or BSD
Summary: License should be MIT or Ruby or BSD
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rubygem-mocha
Version: 20
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Vít Ondruch
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-05-29 11:15 UTC by Vít Ondruch
Modified: 2014-07-07 15:46 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rubygem-mocha-1.1.0-1.fc21
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2014-07-07 15:46:21 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Vít Ondruch 2013-05-29 11:15:01 UTC 
The README says:

> You may use, copy and redistribute this library under the same terms as Ruby
> itself or under the MIT license.

Therefore the license should be fixed to

> MIT or Ruby or BSD

Actually upstrema should be queried about the BSD, since the Ruby license changed from GPLv2+ or Ruby to BSD or Ruby.
Comment 1 Fedora End Of Life 2013-09-16 14:02:30 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 20 development cycle.
Changing version to '20'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora20
Comment 2 Vít Ondruch 2014-07-07 15:46:21 UTC 
https://github.com/freerange/mocha/issues/201
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.