Bug 968278 - License should be MIT or Ruby or BSD
License should be MIT or Ruby or BSD
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rubygem-mocha (Show other bugs)
Unspecified Unspecified
unspecified Severity unspecified
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Vít Ondruch
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2013-05-29 07:15 EDT by Vít Ondruch
Modified: 2014-07-07 11:46 EDT (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: rubygem-mocha-1.1.0-1.fc21
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2014-07-07 11:46:21 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Vít Ondruch 2013-05-29 07:15:01 EDT
The README says:

> You may use, copy and redistribute this library under the same terms as Ruby
> itself or under the MIT license.

Therefore the license should be fixed to

> MIT or Ruby or BSD

Actually upstrema should be queried about the BSD, since the Ruby license changed from GPLv2+ or Ruby to BSD or Ruby.
Comment 1 Fedora End Of Life 2013-09-16 10:02:30 EDT
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 20 development cycle.
Changing version to '20'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
Comment 2 Vít Ondruch 2014-07-07 11:46:21 EDT

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.