Bug 971692 - quota: the information displayed in not aligned
quota: the information displayed in not aligned
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Product: Red Hat Gluster Storage
Classification: Red Hat
Component: glusterd (Show other bugs)
2.1
x86_64 Linux
high Severity high
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Krutika Dhananjay
Saurabh
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2013-06-07 03:17 EDT by Saurabh
Modified: 2016-01-19 01:11 EST (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.4.0.12rhs.beta2
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-09-23 18:39:49 EDT
Type: Bug
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Saurabh 2013-06-07 03:17:32 EDT
Description of problem:
the soft and hard limits are displayed with in correct values, Basically a flip flop of each other

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
[root@rhsauto033 ~]# rpm -qa | grep glusterfs
glusterfs-3.4rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-fuse-3.4rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-geo-replication-3.4rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64
glusterfs-server-3.4rhs-1.el6rhs.x86_64


How reproducible:
alwasy

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a 6x2 volume, start it.
2. enable quota.
3. gluster volume quota <volume-name> limit-usage / 1GB
4. gluster volume quota <volume-name> list

Actual results:
[root@rhsauto033 ~]# gluster volume quota dist-rep list
	path		  limit_set (soft/hard)		     size
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
/                                      1GB/90%               0Bytes



Expected results:

soft should display (90%) and hard should display 1GB

Additional info:
Comment 4 Scott Haines 2013-09-23 18:39:49 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. 

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1262.html
Comment 5 Scott Haines 2013-09-23 18:43:48 EDT
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. 

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2013-1262.html

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.