Description of problem:
The job named plug and play failed on both win2k3-32 and win2k3-64 OS.
Though QE disable S3 and S4 support it still failed.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5 times failed 5 times
Steps to Reproduce:
1./usr/libexec/qemu-kvm -M rhel6.4.0 -m 2G -smp 4 -cpu cpu64-rhel6,+x2apic -usb -device usb-tablet -drive file=win2k3-32-serial.raw,format=raw,if=none,id=drive-ide0-0-0,werror=stop,rerror=stop,cache=none -device ide-drive,drive=drive-ide0-0-0,id=ide0-0-0,bootindex=1 -netdev tap,id=hostnet0,script=/etc/qemu-ifup -device e1000,netdev=hostnet0,mac=00:14:36:35:41:31,id=net0 -uuid 578323c7-bf16-4ff7-8335-ae51f3c2f7da -rtc-td-hack -no-kvm-pit-reinjection -chardev socket,id=111a,path=/tmp/monitor-win2k3-32-serial,server,nowait -mon chardev=111a,mode=readline -name win2k3-64 -vnc :1 -device virtio-serial-pci,id=virtio-serial0,max_ports=16,vectors=4,bus=pci.0 -chardev pty,id=channel0 -device virtserialport,chardev=channel0,name=org.linux-kvm.port.0,bus=virtio-serial0.0 -vga cirrus -global PIIX4_PM.disable_s3=1 -global PIIX4_PM.disable_s4=1
2.submit the job
The job failed while enabling s3/s4 on both win2k3-32 and win2k3-64 OS
The job still failed if disabling S3 and S4,but win2k3-64 got BSOD.
The job can pass successfully.
We could not filter the issue with manual errata #1019 either.So I report it.The related logs and dump files will be uploaded after a while.thanks
Created attachment 758464 [details]
Created attachment 758465 [details]
As win2k3-32/64 has different behavior ,I would like to use this bug to track win2k3-32 job failed issue ,Pls report a new bug about win2k3-64 guest BSOD issue
I run the plug and play test on a guest running Windows 2003 SP2 with all updates installed and I didn't get a BSOD (although the test fails).
Can you please re-run the test on an updated Windows 2003 guest as well and tell me your results?
*** Bug 972383 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
As It still exists ,It's better to proposed to RHEL6.6.0 ,Re-open it
QE retest this issue on hck w/ virtio-win-prewhql-49
guest bosd with c4 error code so that I can not determine whether it is a regression
(In reply to Mike Cao from comment #12)
> QE retest this issue on hck w/ virtio-win-prewhql-49
> Actual Results:
> guest bosd with c4 error code so that I can not determine whether it is a
C4 is driver verifier error and it is not the reason for the current failure. I wouldn't say that this is a regression.
Mike, is this bug is still relevant if testing using WLK (and not HCK)? Thanks.
(In reply to Gal Hammer from comment #14)
> Mike, is this bug is still relevant if testing using WLK (and not HCK)?
Retest this issue on virtio-win-prewhql-74 on RHEL6.5 host
Can not reproduce this issue ,Feel free to close it
Closing based on comment #15.
HCK tests should not be used to certificate for Windows 2003.