Document URL: Section Number and Name: Describe the issue: Suggestions for improvement: Additional information: In the draft wfk 2.3 release notes section 3.5 as of 18-jun: http://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_JBoss_Web_Framework_Kit/2.3/html-single/2.3.0_Release_Notes/index.html#ews_compatibility ^^^ the section is called "EWS compat" yet the list shows what is NOT compatible, which is counter-intuitive and Burr Sutter reqeusted this bug to correct it. As reference, the format used in WFK 2.2 is pretty clear: https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/JBoss_Web_Framework_Kit/2.2/html-single/2.2.0_Release_Notes/index.html#idm4102752 Thanks
Modifying the section to list only incompatible frameworks was intentional. Instead of listing all frameworks (and creating duplicity with the tier lists above), I wanted to simplify and put it the way that "all but the following" are compatible with EWS. I agree though that it was counterintuitive due to the title. How about changing the title to "Frameworks Incompatible with Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Web Server": Burr, Mark: Does that work for you? If not, I can still change it to be as it was previously. Docs stage URL: https://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_JBoss_Web_Framework_Kit/2.3/html/2.3.0_Release_Notes/ews_compatibility.html
I believe the original version was more useful for an EWS customer, wanting a concise list of what is actually supported on EWS.
Ok, I restored the original list (and updated it with newly added frameworks). Docs stage URL: https://documentation-devel.engineering.redhat.com/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_JBoss_Web_Framework_Kit/2.3/html/2.3.0_Release_Notes/ews_compatibility.html Quick check URL: http://file.brq.redhat.com/ppenicka/WFK23_RN_draft/