Bug 988298
| Summary: | [rhevm-dwh] - Setup uses incorrect execution of 'su' and fails | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager | Reporter: | Yaniv Lavi <ylavi> | ||||||
| Component: | ovirt-engine-dwh | Assignee: | Itamar Heim <iheim> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Barak Dagan <bdagan> | ||||||
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | high | ||||||||
| Version: | 3.3.0 | CC: | acathrow, bazulay, iheim, pstehlik, Rhev-m-bugs, yeylon | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||
| Target Release: | 3.3.0 | ||||||||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | integration | ||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | rhevm-dwh-3.3.0-6.el6ev.noarch.rpm | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||||
| Doc Text: |
Previously, rhevm-dwh-setup used an incorrect execution of 'su' and failed. The 'su' utility location has been updated, so installation succeeds as expected.
|
Story Points: | --- | ||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2014-01-21 14:59:28 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1019461 | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Yaniv Lavi
2013-07-25 09:20:24 UTC
Created attachment 778151 [details]
Setup log
*** Bug 989233 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 989234 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 782748 [details]
remote-setup-log
@David This bug has nothing to do with Remote DB configuration. Please test it with local DB install. I should test both setup or are we removing and not supporting Reports in a remote DB Setup? 1. This has nothing to do with reports. 2. This BUG has nothing to do with remote DB setup. 3. You should, of course, test all flows, but the problem described in this bug should not affect remote installation in any way. I installed reports & dwh on 3.3/is12
rhevm-dwh 3.3.0-8.el6ev
Reports - 3.3.0-7.el6ev
rhevm-dwh-setup gave error
Error encountered while installing rhevm-dwh, please consult the log
file: /var/log/ovirt-engine/rhevm-dwh-setup-2013_09_02_10_58_49.log
2013-09-02 10:58:51::DEBUG::common_utils::787::root:: retcode = 1
2013-09-02 10:58:51::ERROR::rhevm-dwh-setup::352::root:: Exception caught!
2013-09-02 10:58:51::ERROR::rhevm-dwh-setup::353::root:: Traceback (most
recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/rhevm-dwh-setup", line 268, in main
minimalVersion = utils.getVDCOption("MinimalETLVersion")
File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine-dwh/common_utils.py", line 144, in
getVDCOption
output, rc = execCmd(cmdList=cmd, failOnError=True, msg="Error:
failed fetching configuration field %s" % key)
File "/usr/share/ovirt-engine-dwh/common_utils.py", line 790, in execCmd
raise Exception(msg)
Exception: Error: failed fetching configuration field MinimalETLVersion
I use latest IS12
Verified on is17.1: # rpm -qa | egrep 'dwh|reports' rhevm-dwh-3.3.0-13.el6ev.noarch jasperreports-server-pro-5.5.0-2.el6ev.noarch rhevm-reports-3.3.0-10.el6ev.noarch setup finished successfully This bug is currently attached to errata RHEA-2013:15116. If this change is not to be documented in the text for this errata please either remove it from the errata, set the requires_doc_text flag to minus (-), or leave a "Doc Text" value of "--no tech note required" if you do not have permission to alter the flag. Otherwise to aid in the development of relevant and accurate release documentation, please fill out the "Doc Text" field above with these four (4) pieces of information: * Cause: What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present. * Consequence: What happens when the bug presents. * Fix: What was done to fix the bug. * Result: What now happens when the actions or circumstances above occur. (NB: this is not the same as 'the bug doesn't present anymore') Once filled out, please set the "Doc Type" field to the appropriate value for the type of change made and submit your edits to the bug. For further details on the Cause, Consequence, Fix, Result format please refer to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#cf_release_notes Thanks in advance. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0036.html |