Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 991296
The status of nic was shown "unconfigured" when configure nic with "static ipv6"
Last modified: 2014-01-21 14:48:00 EST
Description of problem: Disabled "IPv4 Setting" and Configure nic with "static ipv6", after configured nic successfully, check that the status of nic was shown "unconfigured" in network page. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): rhev-hypervisor6-6.5-20130725.0.el6 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. Install rhevh6.5. 2. Select a NIC and configure it with IPv6 Static mode. Bootprotocol : ( ) Disabled ( ) Auto ( ) DHCP (X) Static IP Address : 2001::10 Netmask : Gateway : 2001::1 Actual result: After step2, configured nic successfully, but check that the status of nic was shown "unconfigured" in network page Expect result: After step2, configured nic successfully, NIC appears as configured and also the Bootprotocol of "IPv6 Setting" was shown "(X) Static" in network detail page Additional info:
To be tested.
Test version: rhev-hypervisor6-6.5-20131017.0.iso ovirt-node-3.0.1-4.el6 Using edit-node install ovirt-node-plugin-puppet into rhev-hypervisor6-6.5-20131017.0.iso, then install this edited iso enter into puppet page and check that the Entry "Puppet Certificate Name" has its' colon Test as follows: 1. Install rhevh6.5. 2. Select a NIC and configure it with IPv6 Static mode. Bootprotocol : ( ) Disabled ( ) Auto ( ) DHCP (X) Static IP Address : 2001::10 Prefix Length : 128 Gateway : 2001::1 Test result: After step2, configured nic successfully, NIC appears as configured and also the Bootprotocol of "IPv6 Setting" was shown "(X) Static" in network detail page. so this bug has been fixed, change the status into "VERIFIED".
This bug is currently attached to errata RHBA-2013:15277. If this change is not to be documented in the text for this errata please either remove it from the errata, set the requires_doc_text flag to minus (-), or leave a "Doc Text" value of "--no tech note required" if you do not have permission to alter the flag. Otherwise to aid in the development of relevant and accurate release documentation, please fill out the "Doc Text" field above with these four (4) pieces of information: * Cause: What actions or circumstances cause this bug to present. * Consequence: What happens when the bug presents. * Fix: What was done to fix the bug. * Result: What now happens when the actions or circumstances above occur. (NB: this is not the same as 'the bug doesn't present anymore') Once filled out, please set the "Doc Type" field to the appropriate value for the type of change made and submit your edits to the bug. For further details on the Cause, Consequence, Fix, Result format please refer to: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#cf_release_notes Thanks in advance.
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0033.html