Bug 999526 - Not precise description of the JNDI namespaces
Summary: Not precise description of the JNDI namespaces
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 6
Classification: JBoss
Component: Documentation
Version: 6.1.0
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: GA
: EAP 6.1.1
Assignee: sgilda
QA Contact: Russell Dickenson
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-21 13:34 UTC by Ondrej Chaloupka
Modified: 2014-08-14 15:23 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Build: CSProcessor Builder Version 1.12 Build Name: 11863, Migration Guide-6.1-4 Build Date: 15-08-2013 13:16:01 Topic ID: 4589-460280 [Specified]
Last Closed: 2013-09-16 20:28:56 UTC
Type: Bug


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ondrej Chaloupka 2013-08-21 13:34:20 UTC
Title: Update Application JNDI Namespace Names

EJB 3.1 introduced a standardized global JNDI namespace and a series of related namespaces that map to the various scopes of a Java EE application.
- the EJB 3.1 does introduce just that three namespaces where the session bean has to be bound to. The other namespaces could be defined in JavaEE spec and by particular vendor of app server.

...the three JNDI namespaces used for portable JNDI lookups are
this should be reformulated as well. As the three namesapces are used for looking for the session beans

Comment 1 sgilda 2013-08-23 12:37:09 UTC
Modified the opening text in topic 4589

EJB 3.1 introduced a standardized global JNDI namespace and a series of related namespaces that map to the various scopes of a Java EE application. Portable EJB names only get bound to three of them: java:global, java:module, and java:app. Applications with EJBs that use JNDI must be changed to follow the new standardized JNDI namespace convention.

Changes:
Topic 4589 - 'Update Application JNDI Namespace Names' - rev 500566
Topic 19236 - 6.1.1 Migration Guide


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.