Bug 624838 (APSB10-17) - acroread: multiple critical security flaws (APSB10-17)
Summary: acroread: multiple critical security flaws (APSB10-17)
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: APSB10-17
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 624839 624840 625503
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2010-08-17 21:22 UTC by Vincent Danen
Modified: 2019-09-29 12:38 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-08-20 12:26:50 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2010:0636 0 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Critical: acroread security update 2010-08-20 12:09:32 UTC

Description Vincent Danen 2010-08-17 21:22:41 UTC
Adobe has announced a forthcoming update to Adobe Acrobat Reader that will address critical security issues:

http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb10-17.html

Comment 2 Vincent Danen 2010-08-18 04:10:39 UTC
The bulletin addresses:

* These updates resolve an integer overflow vulnerability that could lead to code execution (CVE-2010-2862).

* These updates further mitigate a social engineering attack that could lead to code execution (CVE-2010-1240).

* These updates incorporate the Adobe Flash Player update as noted in Security Bulletin APSB10-16.

The first issue is tracked via bug #621687 and the Flash Player-related issues are tracked via bug #622947.

CVE-2010-1240 was previously noted to have been corrected in APSB10-15 (see bug #609203), so Adobe should have used a different CVE name here instead.

Comment 3 Tomas Hoger 2010-08-20 09:33:51 UTC
All the issue are public now via updated APSB10-17.

(In reply to comment #2)
> CVE-2010-1240 was previously noted to have been corrected in APSB10-15 (see bug
> #609203), so Adobe should have used a different CVE name here instead.

Yes, looks like and incorrect use of original CVE for what should have got a new CVE for an incomplete fix.  More details about the issue, including PoC PDFs:

Original discovery and 9.3.3 fix:
http://blog.didierstevens.com/2010/03/29/escape-from-pdf/
http://blog.didierstevens.com/2010/06/29/quickpost-no-escape-from-pdf/

Report that 9.3.3 fix is incomplete:
http://blog.bkis.com/en/adobe-fix-still-allows-escape-from-pdf/

Demo PDF files to not seem to trigger any launch file dialog on Linux Adobe Reader version.

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2010-08-20 11:41:04 UTC
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Extras for RHEL 4
  Extras for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5

Via RHSA-2010:0636 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0636.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.