Bug 1771392 (CVE-2007-0899) - CVE-2007-0899 clamav: heap based overflow in libclamav/fsg.c
Summary: CVE-2007-0899 clamav: heap based overflow in libclamav/fsg.c
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG
Alias: CVE-2007-0899
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1771394 1771395
Blocks: 1771393
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2019-11-12 09:52 UTC by Dhananjay Arunesh
Modified: 2020-03-30 15:58 UTC (History)
11 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-11-13 03:36:03 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dhananjay Arunesh 2019-11-12 09:52:53 UTC
There is a possible heap overflow in libclamav/fsg.c before 0.100.0.

Reference:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2007-0899

Comment 1 Dhananjay Arunesh 2019-11-12 09:53:41 UTC
Created clamav tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: epel-all [bug 1771395]
Affects: fedora-all [bug 1771394]

Comment 2 Sergio Basto 2019-11-13 03:36:03 UTC
(In reply to Dhananjay Arunesh from comment #0)
> There is a possible heap overflow in libclamav/fsg.c before 0.100.0.
> 
> Reference:
> https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2007-0899

https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/clamav

Rawhide 	0.101.4-1.fc32 	None
Fedora 32 	0.101.4-1.fc32 	None
Fedora 31 	0.101.4-1.fc31 	None
Fedora 30 	0.101.4-1.fc30 (update) 	None
Fedora 29 	0.101.4-1.fc29 (update) 	None
Fedora EPEL 8 	0.101.4-1.el8 	None
Fedora EPEL 7 	0.101.4-1.el7 	None
Fedora EPEL 6 	0.100.3-1.el6 	None

Comment 5 Dave Baker 2020-03-30 15:58:33 UTC
CVSS has been updated to match NIST.  This flaw pre-dates the existing upstream git repo, so I've been unable to find the specific patch that addressed the flaw.  However, based on other "possible heap overflows" from that era, their CVSS looks to be appropriate.

It's possible this flaw is the same one from 2005 noted here: https://seclists.org/vulnwatch/2005/q4/33


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.