Bug 441458 (CVE-2008-1692) - CVE-2008-1692 eterm: unsafe defaulting to using :0 when DISPLAY is unset
Summary: CVE-2008-1692 eterm: unsafe defaulting to using :0 when DISPLAY is unset
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: CVE-2008-1692
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL: http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=C...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-04-08 08:12 UTC by Tomas Hoger
Modified: 2019-09-29 12:24 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-11-16 09:48:21 UTC
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tomas Hoger 2008-04-08 08:12:52 UTC
Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures assigned an identifier CVE-2008-1692 to the following vulnerability:

Eterm 0.9.4 opens an xterm on :0 if -display is not specified and the DISPLAY environment variable is not set, which might allow local users to hijack X11 connections.

Refences:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473127
http://secunia.com/advisories/29577

Comment 1 Tomas Hoger 2008-04-08 08:19:07 UTC
Confirmed on eterm-0.9.4-8.fc8

This issue is generally considered to have a very low security impact.  See
discussion on the oss-security mailing list.
  http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2008/03/04/1
  http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=120464342901584&w=4
  http://marc.info/?l=oss-security&m=120483883801309&w=4

It may still be worth changing /removing this unsafe default behavior in Rawhide
for future versions of Fedora.

Possible patch attached in Debian bug report.


Comment 2 Terje Røsten 2008-04-08 17:05:58 UTC
Thanks for the report!

Build available in koji:

 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=45498

Will be included in F9 proper or as update.






Comment 3 Terje Røsten 2008-11-14 22:35:15 UTC
An update release to fix bug # 467553 also fixed this issue for all active
releases: F8, F9 and F10.

What's the policy, can I close this ticket or should Security Response Team
verify and possibly close it?

Comment 4 Tomas Hoger 2008-11-16 09:48:21 UTC
Upstream seems to have fixed this in 0.95, so fixed upstream version went to stable Fedora even before bug #467553, via:

  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-7549
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-7500

Just a note, -2 is not in F10 yet, but it does not really matter with respect to this bug, as -1 already is.  Hence closing this.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.