Bug 799275 (CVE-2012-1098) - CVE-2012-1098 rubygem-activesupport: XSS in SafeBuffer#[] (unescaped safe buffers can be marked as safe)
Summary: CVE-2012-1098 rubygem-activesupport: XSS in SafeBuffer#[] (unescaped safe buf...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: CVE-2012-1098
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard: impact=moderate,public=20120301,repor...
Depends On: 799279 800000 800015 800018 809588
Blocks: 755014 767033
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-03-02 10:55 UTC by Jan Lieskovsky
Modified: 2019-06-08 19:03 UTC (History)
9 users (show)

Fixed In Version: rubygem-activesupport 3.0.12, rubygem-activesupport 3.1.4, rubygem-activesupport 3.2.2
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-08-24 15:24:30 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Jan Lieskovsky 2012-03-02 10:55:18 UTC
A cross-site scripting (XSS) flaw was found in the way the String class, used in Ruby on Rails, performed HTML escaping of SafeBuffer objects, when such objects were manipulated directly via '[]' method or other methods, also returning new instances of SafeBuffer object. By using these methods, such newly returned SafeBuffer instances would be inadvertently marked as HTML safe. If a Ruby on Rails application used SafeBuffer objects this way, a remote attacker could provide a specially-crafted input, which once processed by such SafeBuffer instance would pass the HTML escaping test without further filtering, possibly leading to arbitrary HTML or webscript execution.

References:
[1] http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2012/3/1/ann-rails-3-0-12-has-been-released
[2] http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-security/browse_thread/thread/edd28f1e3d04e913
[3] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406547

Proposed upstream patches:
[4] http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-security/attach/1c2e01a5e42722c9/3-0-safe-buffer-slice.patch?part=3
    (against v3.0 branch)
[5] http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-security/attach/1c2e01a5e42722c9/3-1-safe-buffer-slice.patch?part=4
    (against v3.1 branch)
[6] http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-security/attach/1c2e01a5e42722c9/3-2-safe-buffer-slice.patch?part=5
    (against v3.2 branch)

Comment 2 Jan Lieskovsky 2012-03-02 11:25:50 UTC
Created rubygem-actionpack tracking bugs for this issue

Affects: fedora-all [bug 799279]

Comment 3 Jan Lieskovsky 2012-03-02 11:37:43 UTC
CVE request:
[7] http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/02/6

Comment 4 Kurt Seifried 2012-03-03 00:32:17 UTC
Added CVE as per http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/03/03/1

Comment 5 Jan Lieskovsky 2012-03-05 15:22:28 UTC
This issue affects the version of the rubygem-activesupport package, as shipped with Fedora release of 16. Please schedule an update.

--

This issue did NOT affect the version of the rubygem-activesupport package, as shipped with Fedora 15.

This issue did NOT affect the versions of the rubygem-activesupport package, as shipped with Fedora EPEL 6 and Fedora EPEL 5.

Comment 6 Jan Lieskovsky 2012-03-05 15:25:00 UTC
Created rubygem-activesupport tracking bugs for this issue

Affects: fedora-16 [bug 800000]

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2012-03-11 17:01:04 UTC
rubygem-actionpack-3.0.11-2.fc17, rubygem-activesupport-3.0.11-3.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2012-03-17 23:40:49 UTC
rubygem-actionpack-3.0.10-3.fc16, rubygem-activesupport-3.0.10-2.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.