Bug 829373 (CVE-2012-1723) - CVE-2012-1723 OpenJDK: insufficient field accessibility checks (HotSpot, 7152811)
Summary: CVE-2012-1723 OpenJDK: insufficient field accessibility checks (HotSpot, 7152...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: CVE-2012-1723
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 828749 828750 828751 828752 828753 828754 828755 828756 828757 828758 828759 828760
Blocks: 824458
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2012-06-06 14:49 UTC by Stefan Cornelius
Modified: 2019-09-29 12:53 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2012-06-20 15:58:21 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:0729 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Critical: java-1.6.0-openjdk security update 2012-06-13 17:09:52 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:0730 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: java-1.6.0-openjdk security update 2012-06-13 17:09:38 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:0734 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Critical: java-1.6.0-sun security update 2013-11-15 00:08:50 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:1009 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: java-1.7.0-openjdk security and bug fix update 2012-06-20 15:39:14 UTC
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2012:1019 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Critical: java-1.7.0-oracle security update 2012-06-20 15:39:05 UTC

Description Stefan Cornelius 2012-06-06 14:49:48 UTC
The HotSpot Java Virtual Machine (JVM) field lookup code did not properly check accessibility rules and for static / non-static mismatch.  A specially-crafted class file could possibly use this flaw to bypass Java sandbox restrictions.

Comment 1 Tomas Hoger 2012-06-12 20:19:24 UTC
Public now via:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/javacpujun2012-1515912.html

Fixed in Oracle Java 7 Update 5 and 6 Update 33.

Comment 3 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-13 13:10:22 UTC
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5

Via RHSA-2012:0730 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0730.html

Comment 4 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-13 13:10:36 UTC
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Via RHSA-2012:0729 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0729.html

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-13 20:02:42 UTC
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Supplementary for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6
  Supplementary for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5

Via RHSA-2012:0734 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0734.html

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 15:15:20 UTC
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Supplementary for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Via RHSA-2012:1019 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1019.html

Comment 8 errata-xmlrpc 2012-06-20 15:16:01 UTC
This issue has been addressed in following products:

  Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6

Via RHSA-2012:1009 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-1009.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.