Bug 1101303 (CVE-2014-0245) - CVE-2014-0245 GateIn WSRP: Information disclosure via unsafe concurrency handling in interceptor
Summary: CVE-2014-0245 GateIn WSRP: Information disclosure via unsafe concurrency hand...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: CVE-2014-0245
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1101304 1101305
Blocks: 1082938 1101321
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2014-05-26 18:21 UTC by Arun Babu Neelicattu
Modified: 2019-09-29 13:17 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

Fixed In Version: gatein-wsrp-2.3.1.Final-prod-1
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
It was found that the implementation of the GTNSubjectCreatingInterceptor class in gatein-wsrp was not thread safe. For a specific WSRP endpoint, under high-concurrency scenarios or scenarios where SOAP messages take long to execute, it was possible for an unauthenticated remote attacker to gain privileged information if WS-Security is enabled for the WSRP Consumer, and the endpoint in question is being used by a privileged user.
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2019-06-08 02:33:05 UTC


Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Product Errata RHSA-2015:1009 normal SHIPPED_LIVE Important: Red Hat JBoss Portal 6.2.0 update 2015-05-14 19:14:47 UTC

Description Arun Babu Neelicattu 2014-05-26 18:21:12 UTC
It was found that the implementation of GTNSubjectCreatingInterceptor class in gatein-wsrp was not thread safe. For a specific WSRP endpoint, under high-concurrency scenarios or scenarios where SOAP messages take long to execute, it is possible for an unauthenticated remote attacker to gain privileged information if WS-Security is enabled for the WSRP Consumer and the endpoint in question is being used by a privileged user.

Comment 3 Kurt Seifried 2015-02-26 19:45:49 UTC
I would like to propose unembargoing this issue public as it is low severity. If there is a significant reason to leave this issue embargoed please let me know.

Comment 5 Chess Hazlett 2015-03-19 19:27:08 UTC
unembargoed.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2015-05-14 15:18:51 UTC
This issue has been addressed in the following products:

  JBoss Portal 6.2.0

Via RHSA-2015:1009 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1009.html


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.