Bug 1906771 (CVE-2020-16591) - CVE-2020-16591 binutils: invalid read in process_symbol_table could result in DoS
Summary: CVE-2020-16591 binutils: invalid read in process_symbol_table could result in...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: CVE-2020-16591
Product: Security Response
Classification: Other
Component: vulnerability
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Red Hat Product Security
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1906773 1906774
Blocks: 1906786
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-12-11 11:52 UTC by Michael Kaplan
Modified: 2021-02-16 18:44 UTC (History)
23 users (show)

Fixed In Version: binutils 2.35
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-12-23 00:27:43 UTC
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Michael Kaplan 2020-12-11 11:52:49 UTC 
A Denial of Service vulnerability exists in the Binary File Descriptor (BFD) in GNU Binutils 2.34 due to an invalid read in process_symbol_table, as demonstrated in readeif.

External References:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25822
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=001890e1f9269697f7e0212430a51479271bdab2
Comment 1 Michael Kaplan 2020-12-11 11:54:15 UTC 
Created binutils tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-32 [bug 1906773]


Created mingw-binutils tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 1906774]
Comment 5 Todd Cullum 2020-12-22 20:12:24 UTC 
Statement:

binutils as shipped in Red Hat Developer Toolsets 9 and 10, Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 BaseOS and GCC Toolsets 9 and 10, are all not affected by this flaw as it was introduced in a newer version of binutils code than shipped for BaseOS and the 9 toolsets, and already patched in the versions shipped with 10 toolsets.
Comment 6 Product Security DevOps Team 2020-12-23 00:27:43 UTC 
This bug is now closed. Further updates for individual products will be reflected on the CVE page(s):

https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2020-16591
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.